The need for common measurement to our morals (P4/4):

The morals such as tolerance, understanding, patience, forgiveness, mercy, care and love …etc; can be found in different people regardless their ages, genders, places, positions or social degrees. Well appreciated because the reasons from applying them in life aren’t due the benefits to get something from in return, neither because of the power they’ve; but because of the desire to be close the most possible to perfection. That’s why the best right you may give to others is the one you do it willingly before being requested for, and the most generous doing you may do is when you don’t need anything from that person in return.

The powerful morals aren’t the same ones that the powerful people do, but they’re the ones which affect deeply even if it doesn’t largely affect, whether on the person himself on others around. Whereas the powerful people may affect largely and quickly even with the horrible morals they do. The powerful morals too are the ones which exceed the focus on self to others too, they’re the ones which show the responsible side of a person towards himself and others at once instead being silly irresponsible running after desires and only.

In this way we can define each moral alike, and the principle isn’t the fears and only, also not the fact to get something in return necessarily. But a personal target to recover the humanitarian side into the person without being blindly guided to his desires and lust. And the question comes in mind here is: which morals are needed to make us closer to the human perfection? Also what’s the utility of being so if we don’t see its effects, neither we’re feeling satisfied from the situation of being perfect?

Before that, let's describe what could the human perfection mean? it's a known fact that the human has a shortage and many flaws, which negates the perfection. but the concept we mean here is the fact of being a minded entity, having a sedate logic, his priorities aren't for materialistic stuff, neither for lust in expense of his mind. In this case there will be flaws aswell, but not same amount as the first time. Also the reasons to fall in stupidities are reasonable in comparing with the first case, that's what may the human perfection means. to be human as it's supposed to be.

The answer of this question is based on the second condition to explain the origins of morals (not due the fears that push to renouncing).The matter is why this concept of life can’t help us to be committed to good morals and principles, I mean when we think that the life is only one and we must live is to the fullest.

When the person is limited on this concept in his view to life, then the success will be to reach his goals anyway, regardless the nature of ways to achieve them. In this situation; if there is a way to do something to get the target (even inappropriate way) but possible to escape from punishment; so the success according this concept is worthy to do in such way. Because that person has some fears really, but not enough to stop him when he was inspired somehow by an outlet to avoid all that and to continue towards his goals. It means his principles and priorities in life aren’t ordered in proper way as they should be. That’s because of the distorted concept of life that he adopted for himself.

And I finish with this too; which concepts for life that can make us consider all these stuff and adopt the proper morals in common between us? And before this; what’s the reference that’s helpful to realize the good morals to apply for our lives?

The conscience plays an important role in this matter, I mean about being a reference for the measurement of morals which ones are needed and which ones are not. The unconscious people can’t be judged for their doings, like someone mad because he’s not responsible on his actions. But the conscience is a magical addition into the human which is able to show what’s true to do and what’s not. That conscience is in common between all people, and it can judge any action to decide whether it’s a good or bad action. Everything that’s going wrongly; it touches deeply our conscience and brings the feeling of grief. But it’s not always possible to play such role because sometimes the reliance on deep and wrong convictions according to the personal view, may deform the conscience and so its measurement. In other words; having a wrong start from certain convictions will lead to reach a wrong end while judging an action.

Getting used to a fact, can promote that into convictions, when the environment (family friends and so on), the habits, and traditions all together push to a certain direction, the way will be easy to get convinced. And what if those bases were wrong, so the convictions will be also so.

Then in same context with what we've discussed before;  what will be effective - as reference- to teach ourselves correct and new convictions that can be common morals in our lives ? i’ll try another time to reply at this question , and i give you a time to think again also.