The need for common measurement to our morals (P3/4)

Philosophers discussed the question: are the powerful morals the same as the morals of powerful people? And is the power (or the ability to do what the person wants) enough to measure a value as a good or bad? Or that must be a look at the benefits meanwhile?

And since some people can avoid every possible punishment for their bad doings (besides their perspective about living this life and only); we get that the fears aren’t enough to keep the person committed to noble morals. Because they can escape and succeed to get in what they aspire whatever the environment truly is in.

If the fears that comes for the environment generally (and from others in particular), and to easily avoid any possible punishment, we’ll need another factor to keep the control, it’s the self-control. When the person exceeds the level of worrying about what others may do in return, to reach the level of worrying about the self-fulfillment; where the person carries such inner reference for self-controlling.

That mechanism comes from the faith that’s locate into the person himself due the convictions s/he has, to prevent him from doing anything wrong even if he can avoid that social judgment. And instead of just caring about their reactions towards him; he’ll care about his (re)-action towards others. Because he has an unseen faith that everything he does; will certainly be judged for, even if he can escape the social judgment. And that’s the advantage which takes out the bad traits in the human and elevate from his value in the existence. But may a faith bring such feelings although it’s not doing that deep effect into the person.

Moreover we can still have some misunderstanding and maybe an opposition too about the same matter, that's why the question will be:  beside the fears and the self- controlling; what else we need to do too? What’s the more criteria we need for reaching the point of being agreed on common values and morals? (to stabilizise the people's life).