the imbalance in spending our care and feelings (3/3).

    We talked before about the fact of overstating in our dealing with animals, and in fact what it’s expressing about. Compare that view to the second one now, I watched a document which following the trajectory of the life of elephants, it was interesting to find out about the nature. During the way; one female fell sick when the caravan couldn’t wait it except its son which stayed nearby. Logically I was waiting when I’ll see the help to treat the elephant, but instead to offer that necessary care, they preferred to keep filming the end how it will be for hours to record that dramatic end.

    I don’t mean the situation like to saving a gazelle from a tiger, that’ll be a wrong interference in the nature and breaking the nature’s principal laws, so offering the help when it’s needed (as we said before) doesn’t mean to transgress on the normal process of the nature, also doesn’t mean to overstate in the care, right, but to help a wounded animal is something else and different to the two figures. Here where the animal’s welfare is required, instead of the previous figure that’s definitely legal and lawful.

    I didn’t find an explanation to this doing really, except the personal interest. Of course we have to care about animals –as we do with nature- by the necessary and treat them in proper way with mercy, but we can’t be as good as their lives in nature. We should do that for humans who deserve this kind of care like orphans or refugees of wars –as an example-.

    So when the matter requires care, usually people purely look for their interests without mercy nor care about the things around them. And in the same time they go far in the care and provide all kinds of mercy, whereas the matter can be controlled by keeping the middle distance in the dealing. In my opinion I don’t think it’s the right way to show the suitable care for animals and both are extremists in somehow.

    I my opinion, it’s not more than exaggeration in the two sides to the extremities, and it’s not more than tries to doing changes differently than the usual (when it becomes unbearably boring), and the freedom eased that way to try and be convinced with, maybe certain approbation comes from religious aspects and healthy results that someone get in fact, but not to be in the way that it’s in real life now.

    Recently, I’ve see a report showing some annoyance from animals rights organizations from those who possess animals, because they took them to special saloons, to colour them strangely and apply some weird cut hairs by shaving it. Really it’s not bad to possess animals and to give names to your pet like cat, horse, or dog, of course I don’t see all in black, some studies confirmed that the being with animals is bringing more happiness to elderly, they’ve some advantages surely, like when they give them reasons to move and be active in the life at least on a personal level (while those people are caring about something).

    And what I blamed here is: the dissociation in the social and family ties, furthermore; it’s not bad to care about animals -in reasonable way-, but when we check statistics and see around the world, we can find how many people are in need to help before any exaggeration to do with an animal, just keeping the reason with.

        To care about animals; it’s always necessary of course especially when it’s needed as we see in some governmental programs for protection from the human also (what the strange paradox). But the question for us as individuals; do we do that in the correct way as it should be done? Everyone can find the answer by himself and think about, probably there is something to rectify, don’t you think so?

the imbalance in spending our care and feelings. (1/3)

    I got a question from a friend: why we’ve names? Briefly I said that the name refers to his owner, usually it puts its traces in the personality of the person from the first times when he understands its meanings (name’s meanings) also from knowing stories of great people who got the same name and they play the role of models for him/her, and it effects on feelings towards the name as well.

    “Why we give animals names? Do they understand too the meanings too?” my friend continued so

    “Of course no” I replied, what people do today is a part from the social luxury. That’s from one side, and it's, just an interpretation for the need to live socially in the life. or just a picture of modern life, besides, the human is exaggerating to care about animals (especially pets) because of many reasons like the shortage in the human interactions, and less of social communication between people, social connection (even family ties) became weaker, that’s why people look for a different way to skip the situation, so animals become like a last outlet to cover that shortage in the life, especially when animals don’t demand a lot nor conditions for relations with.

    Regardless to the new life’s challenges and people do getting dogs often for more security, that’s great of course, but that you love animals so not necessary to have into your room on bed or sofa, you can be close to them by your care or going to park, right. They're not toys made for our fun and good mood, ok. So don't make all your interests in something like that and only, right

    And maybe if you’ve the enough social live (familiar life) you won't have time for animals as you do now, because you'll have something more precious to spend time with, because usually that (overstatement in) the interest - in pets- comes from the loneliness that people are living in life, unfortunately. So to trust animals and love them because they also love the human in return without conditions and easier to get them from, that’s what promoted this impression.

    And when you're so interested in what you've at home, you'll be thankful for your life and all graces you've got, animals won’t be for you more than a creature that requires a help and care from you only when it's necessary, maybe we can exclude dogs and cats, but some animals can’t be as pets really and preferably (to this creature) to leave in the nature that it's created in. then it will enjoy and feel the life better than being at homes,

    According to what’s termed by “the positional arms race” in the social life of people, which redefine again what’s “adequate and enough” for the person in his ordinary process of life. It becomes today a part of lifestyle and people exaggerate in that way by more care, and treat them like their kids or maybe more, in this case we can call them humans instead animals, am I right? And I’m sure many people do call their pets like that, because they were failed from society around and couldn’t find the good companionship

    Even about using animals, I make a difference between putting them in parks like nature reserves, in way to protect the type of certain animals from extinction, AND the fact of using animals for fun and impose cruel exercises on them like in circus or home’s cages. They’re created to help you get your purposes but not to be games between your hands.

the imbalance in spending our care and feelings (2/3).

    In the other hand; some people work on animals rights and those vegetarians and vegans who abstain eating fish, meat and poultry –or any of their products- for ethical reason too and compassion of animals which started in first from India. And it’s developed through the Greeks then mixed with religious aspects according to certain old manuscripts to be a lifestyle in world culture today away from any religious commitments.

    I remind you by one truth: the animals and wild fruits were the basic food for the mankind –for hundreds of centuries- before the discovery of the agriculture (in the near east), where people were imposed to relying on migration and traveling life to guarantee their existence.  Secondly the most consummated meal is coming from those 03 kinds of animals, poultry, sheep, and beef respectively-regardless to fish-. But we never heard about the extinction in any kind of them or that they’re endangered species, though the big consummated amount every day, every month and every year.  It’s a part of the food chains that balance the life on the globe.

    And that last (animals) was the main factor to guarantee the continuity of the human race (regardless to plants), it’s a settlement, and its advancement towards the civilization as well. Besides; I can also say that plants are creatures, and then you shouldn’t eat from them or their fruit, at all too, because we can consider that also as a settlement, is it logical? Think about it.
    What about your pets, which kind of food you give them? isn’t made from animals too? And how the chain of food is going in the nature? We’re a part of the nature, aren’t we? but human has a mind to wisely use his environment.

    I’ll quote those verses from what I knew, and the Quran says:

And cattle He has created for you (people): from them ye derive warmth, and numerous benefits, and of their (meat) ye eat. (16-05).

All food was lawful to the Children of Israel except what Israel had made unlawful to himself before the Torah was revealed. Say, [O Muhammad], "So bring the Torah and recite it, if you should be truthful." (93-05).

And for you in them is [the enjoyment of] beauty when you bring them in [for the evening] and when you send them out [to pasture] in the morning. (16-06).

And they carry your heavy loads to lands that ye could not (otherwise) reach except with souls distressed (difficulties): for your Lord is indeed Most Kind, Most Merciful, (16-07).

And it is He who subjected the sea for you to eat from it tender meat and to extract from it ornaments which you wear. And you see the ships plowing through it, and [He subjected it] that you may seek of His bounty; and perhaps you will be grateful. (16-14).

   Those quotations are showing the fact of relationship we should have with all creatures around and especially with animals. It’s clarifying simply how it should be and the way we deal with them also. And instead of the fact of taking the far left and overstated care in animals to be close to the human level; not to be so cruel with them, as we’ll see in next part.

The advantages of travelling across the world

   I continue in the idea that says: “Not everything you think it’s good for you; it’s truly the good one.”

   The traveling is something exhausting for everyone although today it’s easier -and a lot- than it was in the past. I won’t talk about touristic traveling here, but I mean when the traveling is a necessary and obligatory in somehow -maybe from a city to another, or even to go to a different country-.

   Usually in those situations; people taste the batter of hard moment to be obliged to do that. That’s one among events which seem bad in first glance, right!! But the history told us many similar experiences and just different in details. The idea is when you feel yourself obliged to leave your current environment for certain reasons, means that you couldn’t get there (in where you’re now) what you look for, and that becomes helpless to you. It’s hard to quit your comfort zone (as many psychologists call that), whereas it doesn’t mean always to be bad as people think (or as imagine), and one scholar and poet said (before centuries)

   For reaching your goals and satisfying your vim; Immigrate in different countries, because you’ll get five benefits from traveling:

The translation is :

 * Immigrate in the homelands to appealing the summits in life, because in traveling there are five (05) benefits:

1- relief of your worries, 2- acquisition of livelihoods, 3- a science and literatures, 4- decency, and 5- a precious companionship whom you really can coexist with them (he meant : the travel shows you the right person who deserves to be your companion).

* And if they tell that in traveling there is humbleness, or an ordeal, and crossing deserts with difficulties of meeting [with family and relatives, which isn’t as hard as in past]; so the death is better for the person instead of sitting at home for deterioration, and suffering from the slander, the censure, or the envy.

   That’s what the poet said from his knowledge and experiences, and to motivate people to traveling without any fears from it, because to be in different place surrounded by different people, all those sides can show the person more opportunities in the new different environment, because s/he can see their life from new perspectives, as the poet said and it can be the opening of your future and the good life in few months of years later. Moreover the advantages and bounties we mentioned above here.

    Many people exploded their powers and reached their horizons just when they travelled and lived in far place different to their hometown city -or country-, because they met with new chances, and their different looking way to the life, then they can see the opportunities which they can work on (whether in studies, or professional career, or any interest in social life of people). They quickly adapt with the environment and naturally they get the inner motivation because it’s a new experience and there is an enthusiasm inside to do more in it, and usually they achieve their goals with some persistence, also they got more skills and experiences in life.

    If you keep your optimist mood and patience, then don’t regret nor doubt from your previous steps, to be sure and confident and strong enough (not to be confused from). To trust them (those experiences) for making new steps forward and while the goal is to improving yourself always; then you’ve to accept starting modestly and convinced.

    And I finish with this adage of one wise man when he said: “I don’t care in the way how I’ll become [in each morning] good or bad, because I don’t know truly where the goodness for me is: in what I like or what I dislike.”

the destiny and fairness

   The idea that I finished my last article with, I’ll continue with it here too, not everything is good just because we see that. So this miraculous mean “the mind” is amazing like the reality proves to us, but it’s limited in certain stage to show the shortage in human thinking, we can deny that some stuff are above on our abilities and we can surround all and from all sides.

   In starting from people’s requirements, the difficulties come against, and like that everyone think that his challenges in life are the hardest circumstances that someone can have in the world entirely, why? Because the tests are coming according to your abilities against them exactly (those abilities are different from one to another) which allow you enough to conquer them and overcome to what’s next.

   We come to the main point, along the life, the event that seems the reason to refrain you, (in the same times) it can be the guarantee which guarantees your safety later, and then you’ll be redirected towards a new wail for your life and new destiny as well. Also what seems to be bad for you, it can be the best right now, really.

   Which means, how many stories were looking unjust for some people but the time show that it was good to be like that, and an important element to leading to good destiny, I mean instead they regret, they became glad to have this scenario? The morality is to not be rush to be pessimist from your bad times because probably those times are leaning your destiny and leading you to your correct way; maybe it’s better than what you imagined well for you.

   We can have a different life really in its details, but we can’t avoid the guidance of destiny in headlines according to our beginnings which often we don’t command in them.

   What looks bad in our estimation can bring good future within after a while, and what you thought that is better if you’ll have; can be the bad scenario for your life and your future.

   In the next article I’ll bring an example in the same context and we’ll see together the positive sides in life that are coming from what we dislike to happen to us.

Part 03: differences equity & equality

   To continue the ordinary process of life ; people in life clash with many difficulties during the daily routine.

   I always simulate the destiny in life to the tree, the starting of life begins from the root and what they can offer to you as traits circumstances and characteristics and when the person starts really the life and each decision makes a real difference. It means you’re in way crossing so you’ll take one of mains branches on the tree (your tree), then the actual conditions in that will lead you again and again to more branches along your life.

   Generally the tree’s branches display how many possible way were in your life since the birthday, but your decisions and your starting too were the guide all the time towards the situation that you’re right now.

    I give you here another example, the god’s wisdom and ability are occurring in the nature and it’s almost talking in this following way:  excuse me Madame! This is not your way, you can’t pass from it, but you should pass from the easiest one in the other side there, this is just according to the men’s abilities that can resist here. And the same words are for men in other sides of life, also depending to the kind of their abilities and I want to say that the equity never refers the passing from the same way, else it’ll be equality and that’s unjust for some people in many times alike.

    We need to understand that in our minds and to realize well that’s not necessary to be with others in the same way, to be sure you’re the same like them. That leads us to another rules we should learn in this life; don’t unleash absolutely your freedom, until you hurt yourself, people or environment around you! while you aren't aware about that.

    Those ways in everybody’s life are representing his destiny, and like that the destiny offers sometimes the good ways we should benefit from. But we often see the good things -for us- just when they’re according to our desires, although it’s not true always. We can see that in many events happen in our lives, people interpret it like a nature power, but they agree it’s an extraordinary thing above the human. Of course it the life’s nature; coming from the absolute ability of its creator.