One from systems of fighting the infringement on rights

    There are many different ways to insure some social rights for people in the economic side, and to make the equality more efficiency between them in distribution & redistribution of wealth in way that all people of nation feel by equality and justice. I don’t mean to distribute and give to anybody a certain amount of money “NO”, but according to specified rules and for people who really deserve we can guarantee a certain positive results after a while. We always need to discover the world and learn from experiences of different nations – useful experiences – to choose the best for applying them in life as models, today I want to talk about one mechanism in the same context (redistribution of wealth) and share you the information which i know about, it isn’t just a theory but it’s existing in fact.

    “AZ-ZAKAH” it’s the first organized system in history devoted to realise this purpose, it is not just a way to make charity, but it’s an obligation on rich people to give (to acquit) 0.4% (in every year) for the poor.  This system is defined by 3 verses are revealed on Mohammed: the 1^st imposes on the government to take this ratio through an administrative organization (it looks like taxes in first time). In this fact; the rich people believe absolutely that they apply their faith well when undertaking that (dogmatic obligation), and that’s useful for their moral, for their psyches, their feeling and mood as well. Because they obey a religious order and they know properly where their money will go in the end.

    The 2^nd verse assigns precisely the kind of people in society who deserve really a proportion of this wealth (they’re mentioned in 8 different kinds from people). The 3^rd verse show us a moral (ethical) value between people that they don’t ask anyone for money in order to satisfy their needs, and they should be satisfied by the disposable resources the most possible of time.

    The purpose from this system is to guarantee social and economic rights respecting the various segments of society. Furthermore; the people who get this income -in respectful way- they don’t feel anything bad like deprivation or shortcoming. All this harmony inside the society is coming from the interference of faith in the conduct of state. Because of the ethical values derived from belief and everyone can feel the worth of his existence with no marginalization, then a lot of social diseases will disappear from the social life because of the satisfaction feeling (we find a social equilibration). This is not everything; other procedures also are applied in order to organizing more and cover every form of instability (like: preventing the usury and resisting against the monopoly, and decreasing the inflation).

    Of course we can’t please all people 100%, but you can teach them how to be pleasant and satisfied in their lives and this mechanism can play an important role instead of actual tax measures and it results will be more practical and efficacy than now. In the ruling of Omar ibn Abdul-Aziz; the nation reached a perfect application for these rules into society on a very big area in that age, but sadly these amazing solutions aren’t applied in their home countries today because all legislations and laws are inherited from the colonial institutions of the 20th century.

    I’m sure that there are many creative solutions in our world, to save resources, time, and more positive effects, besides to avoid complexities, and only we don’t know or never heard about them until now, but they deserve to consider them, get lessons and look toward the best world.

The income inequality and its effects

    Statistics: The richest 1 percent of the world's population has access to nearly 14 percent of global income, while 20 percent of the poorest people are getting on the 1 percent only.

   The main economic challenge in our century is to decrease the immense gap in the incomes between people in the same country, and insure the most possible of transparency in the redistribution of wealth. All the disposable ways and procedures for achieving that goal are working within partial efficiency, which means that the inequality of income is a big problem in every country not only in the economic aspect; but also social and ethical sides in society as well. In many economies, the fiscal policy is used to maintain the financial system for supporting the economic efficiency (e.g: to reduce the tax evasion or cutting unproductive expenditures), then to spend these revenues more equitably.

   “Many policy makers view a more equal income distribution as a desirable goal, although the underlying motivations may differ. Lower income inequality is often viewed as important for achieving greater equality of opportunities to access economic, social, and political resources.”

   A lot of economists say that this inequality is useful for the economic growth, but today they believe by the contrast of that. Because of many social and ethical advantages coming by reducing the inequality affect positively on the economy. And the most used measure (to show what happen in fiscal policy and to measure its trend in every country) is GINI coefficient (from 0 “absolute equality” to 1 “complete inequality”). “The failure to redistribute income may also reflect a political reality, but it can be limited through more of conscious government policies.”

   Disposable Solutions: Fiscal policy has played a significant role in reducing income inequality in advanced economies, especially in economies with high initial pre-tax and transfer inequality.

   The government’s fiscal policies were a logical reaction to reduce the income inequality over time, especially in the advanced economies through direct taxes (like the income taxes) and indirect (like the expenditure on the education and healthcare or public pensions) to reach a positive points in contributing of growth of economy. And the studies viewed that many countries achieved a substantive progress in decreasing the inequality, but these policies weren’t efficient enough in longer-term.

   “Some economists said that the pursuing the equality can reduce the efficiency and the incentive to work and incest.” Furthermore; “the poor will not receive all the money that is taken from the rich.”

    I copy the same example I found in interesting article about this matter, when the tide is rising, it lifts all boats and helps whether the big and small boats in the port. Where the focusing is only on the small boats can lead to indirect help for all equally. In other way; the government subsidy (financial support) must be oriented to serve the fragile classes in society by projection on them in assigned methods guarantee the proper channel until the targeted people.

   “Still, there may be some win-win policies, such as better-targeted subsidies, better access to education for the poor that improves equality of economic opportunity, and active labour market measures that promote employment.”

Other victims in the societies (part 02)

   Another face to the same situation: (the details of laws in several articles in order to organize well the relationships, the labour market, families, upbringing and care of children), this large quantity or different articles make the social life more difficult because of immobility in these laws. When these articles are detailed to provide more protection and care for different categories in society. But the fact is looking a little different, when these laws bring some risks on family ties and probably to destroy its relations because of no flexibility in the laws and all articles are written by some bare minds from any emotional senses or humanitarian aspects, it’s an abstract law and not enough to cover all society’s sides and circumstances.

   Sometimes I think that we can make robots to manage issues and to announce provisions, without any need to human in these judgments. To tell the truth; the human legislations can’t never cover all matters occur in the society; therefore we need always a proportion of moralities and interference of the human aspect to complete the shortage of the abstract laws.

   Honestly the world today creates many fears. I saw many families can’t live together because of illogical reasons because the law imposes on the family members to live separately when the parents can’t provide the suitable care for children, therefore the government takes them to orphanage, or the separation between couples from different nationalities in reason that they don’t demonstrate substantial evidences for their living together under the same roof. A lot of issues are so clear to make decisions about them, but the details in laws through some articles hamper to go directly to this decisions and the problem  expands more and more.

   It hurts me a lot when I see some families can’t live a normal life like every family, when the laws make the life difficult to some people because the missed link in the matter is the emotional part and our laws are empty from every sense of humanity. And for example, instead to help the low-incomes’ families by governmental programs, they demonstrate their no-ability and spend more expenditures on making solutions for these demonstrations.

What we should do in that situation now?

   I know that the laws are unjust sometimes for some people because they aren’t enough to treat certain issues. But when you can’t get what you want like I said the first example above; why do you think its failure? Maybe only because the results can't come quickly, they need a little time more to come, you should be patient in your steps, to don't give up, and this is an important factor to continue the life normally. And the livelihoods’ ways are available constantly to everyone, only the necessary conditions didn’t gathered yet together, soon that’ll be changed and that’ll be your chance. In other words; never lose your hope about circumstances better for you than you are now.

    I appreciate very much the associative activities from several associations to help these people to fulfilment their goals in life and realize what’s necessary for them to continue a normal life, also the local agencies which provide some services to integrate people in context of certified lifestyle with some innovative solutions to avoid many social problems and conflicts, these activities can allowing to governments to look back in previous steps and correct some rules to reform better the society and give certain rights for a normal life to a wide segment in society.