Other victims in the societies (part 01)

   the lifestyles are the accumulation of habits and doings during many generations, and now we see many things in our lives so important to continue this life, maybe some among them are necessary really, but the problem is when the human becomes like a machine in the daily life, thinks only how to do that, how can i get this or that, ...etc. It's the nature of human to think, develop and enhance, but a lot of thoughts are wrong when we consider them obligatory to live (priority than other things).

   We got in this life many stumbles to limit our vision to horizons, maybe they came from close people, from the general direction in the country (through stupid policies of half-leaders maybe...etc). and the people who are victims to these situation, and we can find them in every country, why they look like victims, because they’re skilled people, educated, young (and you can imagine the power of youth age) all these advantages, but they haven’t anything in life, and don’t get any half opportunity to achieve something, and the wise among them feel that they’re burden on their families, their friends, their societies. They suffer from these situations, then another failure, and maybe third, fourth, ..etc, in different sides in life. In the midst of these conditions, their failures in fact, maybe small, negligible or a little immense but they still failures until now, right, and this is the problem.

   The different events start to accumulate, and in your mind also you start be convinced it's a true crisis, because you still haven't meet any positive thing for few days or weeks (in your mind you think that, because you just see in this way now).

   When these people met a failure for some certain reasons, they thought that the problem is in them, it’s true relatively in somehow but not absolutely, because of many factors are playing in the events and they can interfere in them. “I saw in one document some people who quit the life of today, and preferred the free life in the forest without any exaggerated confines made of the lifestyles in society today, only because they felt by the hypocrisy in the society and it isn’t appropriate to live. They don’t believe it. and remember! You’ll lose the taste of the life if you haven’t any purpose and you don’t do anything in that way to achieve something.

   As we said in the previous articles, that many people suffer in this world, not because they haven’t chance to work something or to give an addition, or they can’t be productive, although they’re ready and eligible to give an additional value, but the problem is in their environment where they couldn’t get an interesting progress because the opportunities are null.

   Another view on the topic; a lot of people are qualified and skilled in their jobs, but they’re fired because they didn’t like the oppression and they wanted to apply in reality their rights. They thought it's easy to do, but in the end; they look like guilty people because they didn’t prefer to keep the silence on unjust matters, because they though really that the government can guarantee their rights and they talked in absolute democracy when they ask their needs and rights, whereas they become disappointed unfortunately and chocked from that.

    Not only that; but they can’t even find a new job in reason of “you threaten the standing of our company, you probably put a crucial case in our company or bring a menace” I saw a report about some people in this situation who feel destroyed and they can’t succeed to have a new job ‘they’re not accepted” when they apply to do. Is it fair enough? I don’t think so it’s a disaster in our century, this 21^st century.

Religion & State: There is no separation in reality (Part 03)

    I’m still giving more arguments about the matter of religion in life, and how the life is very complicated because of these interferences in ways that we don’t see them clearly, but they’re true.

   Today people and nations deal each other in starting from their religious backgrounds, they behave in starting from that it’s the modernization of the new century (new age), that the life imposes it, it’s their understanding to the democracy, and liberty of speech in somehow. They deny the effects of this background on their opinions and views and they try to find a different explanation. Certainly the foreign affairs in every government work in order to guarantee benefits and if we focus on the matter, we’ll see the deep roots of those benefits in religious aspects.

  We can find this effect in every decision, every treatment or deal, so it’s available always as a factor among us using in everywhere, we can’t deny the existing of religious background in the life.

   Practically we can’t separate between these two aspects in everything we do it in life. And I add one more thing. In philosophy the philosophers talked a lot about one important issue, it’s the relationship between the topic and the person who’s studying it? Sometimes the way of events’ organization imposes on you the way how to interpret then to react according to your previous knowledge for many years.

   And it’s called “the regularity of shapes”, the simple example is to draw an arc and ask many people to continue the drawing, the majority (if I don’t say all of them) will complete the arc and draw a circle. Why they don’t draw another form and they have in mind only the circle at the first glance. That’s because depending on the previous knowledge which the person got throughout many years. Furthermore; when I look at the history I distinguish clearly the same effects with these backgrounds.

   Now tell me! Does the interference of your religious background on your deals bring a qualitative addition in your life? What’s the positive effect on your way to see and treat everything happening around you? Don’t you think that this intervention can be unjust sometimes; where you’re mistaken you get wrong opinions, wrong convictions and you believe that you’re certainly right?

   I want you think about this matter to attain answers for controlling more yourself and limit the interference when it is not logical and not wise to not react awfully or not to do something stupid that you’ll regret after it.

   In the next articles, I’ll try to discuss another part from our daily life, and the some problems are in our societies coming from people themselves according to the laws.

Religion & State: There is no separation in reality (part 2)

    All details in our life today are accumulations of several experiments and it’s possible that they came only from the human mind “alone”, but it’s based on truths overriding this human and derived from a great power in the universe who brought this law (which it’s represented in religious legislation “coming from the god and not the part made of people under religious cover”).

    These rules are approved (agreed) with our instincts and the social heritage during many centuries, therefore they –the rules- organize better the life from spiritual aspect through all religions of humanity.

    In everywhere; airports, hotels, institutions …etc we find the toilets are separated why? Why we feel awful when we see bad behaviour, but we enjoy and feel pleasant about the good deeds? Why we’ve this impression. We sleep at night while we awake on day to strive and work. When people break the rule which organize well the nature of relationships between man and woman, our societies become more unstable. If we search more, we’ll see many great social values and decencies came from our pure religions and they still until now in our customs.

   How can we make this separation, and the religion is a part from the family relations and social life between people even the relationship between the sexes is controlled by the faith, especially if we talked about the celebrated religions (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) and all these matters enter in the state governance.

   Can you see how much the faith influences on our thoughts, behaviours, our decisions and deals in unintentional way?

   Everyone asks himself about the reasons why he likes or dislikes this or that? All feelings, like hate, revenge, love, are controlled by his religion (I gather all mankind in the same side, even the agnostics and atheist are certainly human religions made of themselves *). I can make an easy question here does your faith hamper (prevent) you to decide something in your life? In other way; was your belief the cause to change an opinion about someone, then some people, or change your decisions in life? Nobody can answer me “NO” because we all do that in life, the most important question now is there any way to control it when the guidance is wrong on me? And there is a way to distinguish between the positive and negative effects of religion in your views and convictions?

*All habits and traditions which the human abides them is his religion, whether it was based on belief in god or not.

Religion & State: There is no separation in reality (part 01)

The principle of the separation between “religion” and “state/power (government institutions)”, it appeared in order to release the mind from the myth, to reducing the power of religious authorities in the state, which brought the materiality sense on all moralities’ sources.

This principle is one of the most important principles and great achievements for the modern democracy of the new “century”. The purpose was to guarantee the absolute freedom for everyone without any authority which limits this liberty. But in the reality this separation didn’t realised at all.

The link between the two matters is existing always. It’s a part of the social psychological, in the people’s convictions even the majority don’t know about it and in fact it’s existing inside them. They tell opinions they decide, they behave according to their religious convictions. The public activities are influenced by religious beliefs and practices when the gaol -from this policy in life- was quite the opposite.

Probably it’s not so clear when the treatment is between people who have this side in common ( in the same area), when they cross the distances to far nations, new customs and traditions, new religions, new lifestyles, in that time they’ll feel the difference in treatment and vice versa.

One simulation is in my mind and I imagine this story; if a person had cruel circumstances in his life, the misery and maybe the living in war, if this life made him an unorganized person (of course he still thinking to survive and to demand the better for his life), but in the first meeting with “the civilized” person (like all people understand this word) should not expect to get a formal treatment from him, simply because the first doesn’t know exactly how to undertake that and his psychological condition is already broken. In order we hope to get the understanding from the second person to manage that. But if he wants to be standing against him through new technologies or maybe weapons even to kill him. In my opinion, the both are beasts, because of some wrong comportments are controlling their behaviours. It’s a pity and very sad to see this tragic end. One among these compartments is the religion. Why we can’t welcome to the other only because of their faith? What are the main reasons for that? Can we find objective answers and not to relax our consciences, but to reach the truth? It’s very important to do that, and it needs to think about it too.