The rights & confines:

  The liberty represents a philosophical problem, where philosophers divided between 2 ways, who says it’s absolute for the human, and in contrast who sees it’s limited in confines. And every one among them has his arguments to confirm his opinion. We don’t want to broaden in this matter through the philosophical aspect because of the aim here is to light the way and give a general idea about “ the freedom of expression”, in the time where it becomes one of top issues in world today, with several faces and aspects.

  A lot of slogans are on, in the name of human rights (generally), or women rights, minorities …etc, which proving that the world in confused between many opinions because of “ambiguity in definitions “, and in this way the concept changes from person to another. And that also brings the diversity in positions and reactions too.

  If we say that the human being has the right to do everything he want, so that’s an arguments of individual liberty, and democratic life in society, if we can say that, so is it possible to justify the abuse of somebody to others as a freedom in conducts ? Furthermore; if I choose driving in highway but in the opposite direction, or acclaim in street with rude speaking and ugly words, only because i want to do that, is it logical??!!! I think this doing couldn’t be expected only when the person is fugitive or mad. And this blindly acting and it isn’t a real right from human rights.

 We give another example; when you hear on TV,  and you receive daily letters mocking from you, because they don’t like your orientations, or what are precious for you, aren’t the same for them. Can we call that as a freedom of speech too?? !!!

Every person, part, or nation, …etc, has a set of sanctities and symbols, which mean models for them in whole life. Is it logical to accuse these symbols and abuse them because they aren’t valuable to me? I think it’s not, or there is another incitation to this stupid doing ..maybe?

 We can’t imagine the democratic reality which considers the freedom of expression, without control and define the concept of this kind of liberties and define that in every domain, so what do we mean by the freedom of expression?

   Maybe somebody says: it means to say (everything I want) about every matter even if the saying includes an abuse to others, other replies: when they accuse me, I couldn’t stay silent, and here we’ll have a mess, a conflict. The act which looks like a liberty in first opinion, this second sees it as an abuse. And that means: if the opinion is mocking and not building, surely it’s a provocation like what it’s happening in policies or gov criticism.

   But to override by your opinion to accuse sacral rites of other communities with no reason, so nobody agrees to you where it is not your business to judge them if they’re right or wrong, whatever in their reflection or religion. And the precise definition which we can give it to “the freedom of expression” is: the liberty of individual (or organizations or authorities) in opinion through his doing or saying stops where it is the end of freedom of others, and no right to override that or abuse them, because they all have the right in their own doings and beliefs, if they don’t touch the beliefs of others communities too. That’s what I meant by the second example (about TV’s ridiculing), when we see many means of media do that to insult communities or nations. In order that shouldn’t be a target to provoke them under the name of freedom.

   In this way we reach the imperative truth:

The freedom of individual “of sound mind” in his opinion, undergoes to confines dictated by his mind, (just to prevent him from assaulting others), without causing any damage or loss of his rights. This concept can be applied to institutions and organizations in the same time.

The transition (oscillation) between the 3 worlds (part 03)

    Many reasons which make this diversity between people, and sometimes make their interests look so small, close and absurd in many times. Among them, the education’s systems in first class, followed by the social conditions of families, in result of bad economic funding, especially in poor countries where their people live only on less than 2 € per month. Furthermore; the historical factor plays an important role to form the living patterns and destabilizing the cultural identity.

   The wars in world contributed in this diversity too, especially the imperial forces which were accompanied by different projects touching the cultural aspects, religious, social and economic too for local citizens who suffered from that for many decades and even now. Also the evacuation toward the mountains and highlands; that make with time (between generations) the ignorance and defeatist mentality, with big interesting only to getting the Livelihoods, and only just to guarantee the continuity. And become (between people) the material and personal benefits more priority than the principles and semitic values in society. Their effects appear in the social life from the simple treatments and deals in daily life to the big levels where we can see it clearly.

    This matter is individual and concerning everybody, therefore the possibility to find it in every society is certain. Because of the commanding conditions are the same, but the effects only change from a person to another.

   The educational level of individual (of educated people) achieves a progress in reflection and helps them more to make important interests with value. But it can’t be an articular criterion, because sometimes we find a contradiction with this description (unfortunately).

   Archives of history, registered the names of people were great in the past, not because of their social positions or their material capacities; but the reason was how much were stable and constant on their principles and values, and sacrificing of them. Starting from a deep belief in them, in contrast; others who don’t remember even themselves, because their value (in society) is associated with their interests , and measured by their ambitions, and mental or tangible products.

The transition (oscillation) between the 3 worlds (part 02)

Everyone (as we said before) is living among these 3 worlds, and all people are spending their lives by thinking according to their world, and they swim in one of these 3 oceans (worlds).

Maybe you wonder now where you classify yourself, in which one? The answer is inside you.

If you’re interested in global ideas, and the principles, the manners and good qualities, (all those) if they’re more important for you (where you can’t across them or override) than satisfying some people or getting benefits,

Or your idols are some (soccer players, actors, singers …etc.), and especially politicians (local authorities), and following all details of these famous people in media. Regardless to the conditions of the real life around you, and your culture is depending only to these things, so i ask you to think again and awake up from this dream, because it’s the world of people.

Or maybe the business (your money, houses, cars, clubs …etc.) dominates on your life, and more important in your opinion, so you’re ready to do everything available to get your targets, and you’re living in the world of things.

Educated people who evaluate the principles and make value for people who have precious characters, and precious minds, these people are living in the 3^rd world (world of ideas).

Everybody can find himself, and can see how much he (she) is integrated in these worlds, and belong to them.

Which one of these options below, do you like?

To living in stupid things, or worshiping some people, it’s the proof to represent really your weakness and no-confidence in yourself.

 Or

Keeping in consideration (at first) the valuable concepts and meanings in life, to give an additional value to the humanity; whatever your position or your place.

These people are sacrificing for the idea, whatever the person who said it, because of the value of this idea is so great, in contrast, others are sacrificing for the persons whatever their ideas and their ways in life. Because of the goal is an intellectual benefit, or material benefit.

In other times, we’ll talk about the reasons which make that between people in this worldly life.

The transition (oscillation) between the 3 worlds

In this world; the people differ in their interests, and aspirations, and everybody has a very special life which it seems so normal life for him (her), but these interests can differ from the great interests to the absurd ones. And they always appear so important for their owners.

According to Malek Ben Nabbi; an Algerian intellectual and philosopher, in his book’s series entitled by “the problems of civilization” he illustrated the transition of human being between 3 worlds throughout his life, these worlds are (the world of things, the world of (people) persons, and the world of ideas), these worlds aren’t physical ( in world’s geography), but they’re mentally worlds ( for everybody), and he said: “the human life, switch between different phases during years. The baby when he is born; he becomes in the first world “world of things”, where everything, every person…etc, around him, looks like a thing. So you can see him playing by his hands in the air, the same way which he plays by his toys. After a few years; this baby grows up and in first years from his life, the transition occurs to the second world “ of persons”, and the child now has very close people to live with them, and they are typifying his world and representing it, these people can be his parents, siblings, …etc. at any time, this kid when he finds himself in street (alone), he scared from this new world ( where nothing is ordinary in this place contrary to what seems at home), because he sees strange people, and can’t feel free until being between his accustomed people, his family and home ( his world)”.

Years later, the boy grows up, and he goes to the kindergarten, to the school, or park, new people walk in his world, and also; new things except what’s inside home. The boy now, is going to school for many years, and he started to think about new experiences, when he heard a lot of them during his classes. And again another transition toward the 3^rd world “world of ideas”, even now, everything looks normal and ordinary, but the problem comes is when many people are blocked in the first world, or maybe the second, when the boy (or girl) becomes young, and his (her) interests are focused on material things only, and the way of knowledge or human sciences are not important to interest by them, here we find the problem in society.

The main problem is when two people react differently toward the same event, or parliamentary declaration for example, when the first treats the problem as nothing happened, whereas the second can see a catastrophic problem, and a big danger for the security of society.

These reactions are different for one reason: these two people aren’t in the same world, and the first one is living in the world of things, and any news about problems in food prices, can disturb him more than human rights in his country or the equality in making critical decisions.

The second one, lives in the world of ideas, so his mind is thinking in high level about the society, and he debates and discusses deeply all sides of this events, the reasons, symptoms, and solutions how to resolve it.

This is the difference simply, different worlds, means different interests, but the question is: which one from these worlds is suitable for the human life?

The next part will take more clarification about the difference between people among these 3 worlds.